Forty browser tabs open on a Sunday afternoon, each one a job listing you half-read before clicking away in frustration. That is the ritual most active job seekers know far too well. The original poster, going by a Latin-flavored handle on Reddit, decided to stop scrolling and hand the entire grind to ChatGPT instead.
The prompt itself is short, and the results caught fire fast: 62 upvotes and a comment thread full of people testing their own tweaks. It tells the model to clone an open-source project called open-jobs, run its built-in search tool chain, and pull the top 200 roles you qualify for, no manual sorting required. The clever part is a step that embeds your ideal job description so every listing gets matched against what you want.
What struck me here is how much of the real work happens before a single listing loads. Skip the clarity step, and the shortlist comes back as vague as your answers. Here is what you get from reading on: the three stacked techniques that make this run without babysitting.
Turn AI into Your Income Engine

Ready to transform artificial intelligence from a buzzword into your personal revenue generator? Our groundbreaking guide "200+ AI-Powered Income Ideas" is your gateway to financial innovation in the digital age.
Inside you'll discover:
• A curated collection of 200+ profitable opportunities spanning content creation, e-commerce, gaming, and emerging digital markets—each vetted for real-world potential
• Step-by-step implementation guides designed for beginners, making AI accessible regardless of your technical background
• Cutting-edge strategies aligned with current market trends, ensuring your ventures stay ahead of the curve
Download your guide today and unlock a future where artificial intelligence powers your success. Your next income stream is waiting.
Get Your Guide
*Ad
What the prompt actually does
Strip it down and the flow is dead simple. The creator points ChatGPT at a specific repo, open-jobs by a developer named elliottdehn, and tells it to run the built-in job-search tool chain. From there the model pulls your top 200 eligible listings and builds a shortlist.
The twist sits in the embedding step. It authorizes a remote service to convert your ideal job description into something the tool can match against. If the model does not know enough about you to write that description, it is told to stop and ask questions first.
Here is why that embedding step is smart, not just jargon. Turning your ideal role into a vector lets the tool rank real listings by closeness to that target, instead of matching raw keywords. It is the gap between 'find jobs with Python in the title' and 'find jobs that feel like the one I described.'
The back-and-forth matters more than it reads on paper. If you have never spelled out your ideal role, seniority, industry, team size, remote policy, this step forces the clarity out of you. Answer vaguely, and you get a vague shortlist back.
Why three stacked techniques make it work
Three moves are stacked in this prompt, and each one earns its place. The first is tool assignment: instead of a fuzzy 'help me find a job,' the creator names the exact repo and tool chain to run. Specificity beats good intentions every time.
The second is explicit constraints. Lines like 'skip sorting' and 'top 200' fence the model off from low-value busywork, like ranking every listing by hand. It stays on the task you care about.
The third is the one most people forget: permission handling. The line pre-authorizing the embedding step heads off a classic failure where agents stall mid-run to beg for consent. I think this is the real lesson buried in a job-hunting prompt.
Think about how often an agent grinds to a halt because it wants a yes before touching a file, an API, or an outside service. Front-load those approvals and the friction vanishes. That trick works anywhere you chain multiple tools, not just here.
The three techniques are the real takeaway here, and reading them is not the same as having the reflex. I run short daily reps in 3 Minute AI, where every lesson ends with a task you actually execute in a built-in chat lab instead of a summary you nod at. Three minutes a day, which is less than you spent on that first tab.
If you have a kid between 6 and 12, you can start teaching them smart money habits right now with Cash App. Kids between 6 and 12 can now have a Cash balance, order a Cash App Card, and start saving, but they don’t get access to the app.** There are no subscription fees, and you control it all through your app and account. Manage money together
A Cash App Card designed by them: They get their own debit card to design, made by them, with you alongside. They can spend their allowance or money from chores, but you can set spending limits.
3.25% interest on savings: Kids can earn 3.25% interest and start building strong saving habits early.**
Safe money transfers: You can choose up to 5 people who can send them money. They can't send money or buy stocks or bitcoin.
Parent-controlled account: They can't log in on their own, and they don't need a phone. You control their account and see their activity.
Create Your Cash App Account Today
**Cash App is a financial services platform, not a bank. Banking services provided by Cash App's bank partner(s). Prepaid debit cards issued by Sutton Bank, Member FDIC. Cash App Visa Debit Flex Cards issued by Sutton Bank, Member FDIC, and The Bancorp Bank, N.A., pursuant to a license from Visa U.S.A. Inc. See terms and conditions for the Sutton prepaid card, Sutton debit flex card, and Bancorp debit flex card. Savings provided by Cash App, a Block Inc. brand. Parents and legal guardians can open a managed account for kids 6-12. To view the eligibility requirements for sponsoring a teen or child, please visit the Sponsored Accounts section of the Cash App Terms of Service. *Cash App will pass through a portion of the interest paid on your savings balance held in an account for the benefit of Cash App customers at Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Member FDIC. To earn interest on your Cash App savings balance, you need to have sponsor approval. Exceptions may apply. Savings yield rate is subject to change.
*Ad
The catch worth knowing before you run it
None of this is free. Cloning a repo, running a full tool chain, and processing 200 listings burns tokens fast. The author is upfront: use a heavier model or you will hit your limit in about 20 minutes.
That warning deserves respect. This is closer to a heavyweight coding job than a quick chat, so treat it like one. Budget your tokens and pick a capable model before you start.
You may also need to hit retry a few times mid-run. Do not panic when it stalls. According to the poster, no progress is lost on retry: the task picks back up from its last checkpoint.
Who should run this
Here is my honest read: this is overkill for casual browsing. If you are idly curious about the market, the token cost is not worth it. But if you are deep in an active search and applying at volume, automating that first filter pass buys back real hours.
Those are hours you can redirect toward tailoring cover letters or prepping for interviews. Career changers get the most from the question step, since it defines 'ideal' before anything gets pulled. One smart tweak: cap the shortlist at 15 or 20 so you are not staring down 200 results after all that work.
You can also hard-code 'remote only,' a location, a salary band, or an industry straight into the prompt instead of hoping the description questions carry all the weight. Spell out what you want. The model rewards precision.
One more thing worth watching: a moderator in the thread asked people to post what they used it for and which tweaks improved results. Early threads like this tend to collect the best variations within days. Small changes to the eligibility criteria or the description questions can shift shortlist quality more than you would expect.
Blu Dot surpasses 2,000% ROAS with self-serve CTV ads
Home furniture brand Blu Dot blew up on CTV with help from Roku Ads Manager. Here’s how:
After a test campaign reached 211,000 households and achieved 1,010% ROAS, the brand went all in to promote its annual sales event. It removed age and income constraints to expand reach and shifted budget to custom audiences and retargeting, where intent was strongest.
The results speak for themselves. As Blu Dot increased their investment by 10x, ROAS jumped to 2,308% and more page-view conversions surpassed 50,000.
“For CTV campaigns, Roku has been a top performer,” said Claire Folkestad, Paid Media Strategist, Blu Dot. “Comping to our other platforms, we have seen really strong ROAS… and highly efficient CPMs, lower than any other CTV partner we've worked with.”
Using Roku Ads Manager, the campaign moved from a pilot to a permanent performance engine for the brand.
Run it tonight if you are actually searching
Open ChatGPT today, pick a heavier model, and pre-authorize outside access before you paste the prompt so the agent runs the whole search without stalling to ask permission halfway through.
Grab the exact prompt and permission setup so your first run shortlists real roles instead of burning tokens on a stall.
Worth 10 minutes if you are applying at volume and want a ranked shortlist instead of scrolling job boards by hand.
Hire Ava, the AI BDR built for enterprise
Ava is the first AI BDR to run outbound end to end, finding leads or ingesting your CRM accounts, sending personalized emails on your reps' behalf, and booking meetings, autonomously or on copilot. She runs outbound for DoorDash and Grammarly. She's SOC 2 Type II audited, SSO and GDPR ready.
*Ad
Poll: Pre-authorizing an agent so it never pauses to ask. Smart, or asking for trouble?
Hit reply and tell us why.




