Here's a test. Open ChatGPT right now, pick any topic you've been meaning to understand, and ask it to explain. If it spits back a Wikipedia wall and you nod along, you just wasted your time and you know it.
I did this for years. Type a question, skim the answer, close the tab, feel productive, retain nothing. Then wonder why the same gap was still there a week later. The tool was fine. The interaction was broken. Reading something and learning something are not the same activity, and we keep pretending they are.
The fix isn't a better model or a longer answer. It's two prompts that change who's doing the work. Instead of ChatGPT studying for you while you watch, these make it study with you. You become a participant, not an audience.
*Ad
Have you been noticing how Claude is the most talked about tool on the internet right now? CLaude has been launching new models & features like claude co-work, claude design, skills, connectors literally every week.
The World’s first Claude-a-thon, A 2 day deep dive into Claude, its user-cases and 10+ other AI tools happening this weekend from 10 am-7pm EST – and they have just 1000 free seats for a limited time.
In the workshop, you'll do deep research on Claude. Build your own artifacts and dashboards. Create full presentations using Claude. Set up Claude Connectors like Indeed to automate your job search.
Register NOW! (free for the next 48 hrs)
🧠Live sessions- Saturday and Sunday
🕜10 AM EST to 7PM EST
Prompt 1: a teacher, not a dictionary
A dictionary hands you a definition and walks away. A teacher hands you a mental model, then pokes it to see if it holds. This prompt turns ChatGPT into the second one.
Paste it in, swap the topic, and you get a sequence instead of an essay: the simplest version first, then layers built on top, then a reality check at the end.
"Teach me this topic from zero, as if I have no background knowledge. Start with the simplest explanation, then build step by step. Use: plain language, real-life examples, simple analogies, common mistakes people make, and a short summary at the end. After explaining, ask me 5 questions to check if I understood it. Topic: [PASTE TOPIC]"
How to run it: drop in your topic, read the whole response before you judge it, then answer the five questions at the end honestly. Got one wrong? Ask it to re-explain just that piece. Try it first on something you think you already know. The questions have a way of surfacing gaps you didn't know were there.
The five questions are the whole point
Skip the questions and you learned nothing. That's not a motivational line, it's the mechanism. Watching someone do a push-up and doing one yourself are different events in your body. Retrieval is the same. Your brain only keeps what it has to reach for.
There's one move that makes the follow-up ten times stronger. When you miss a question, don't say "I didn't get number three." Say "I thought the answer was X because of Y, where did I go wrong?" That single shift turns a re-read into an actual correction. Your brain registers the gap and fills it properly instead of absorbing the same explanation a second time and forgetting it just as fast.
How Jennifer Aniston’s LolaVie brand grew sales 40% with CTV ads
The DTC beauty category is crowded. To break through, Jennifer Aniston’s brand LolaVie, worked with Roku Ads Manager to easily set up, test, and optimize CTV ad creatives. The campaign helped drive a big lift in sales and customer growth, helping LolaVie break through in the crowded beauty category.
*Ad
Prompt 2: 60 seconds to know if it's worth your time
Picture the scenario this was built for. Someone sends you a 4,000-word article. It might be gold, it might be padding, and you do not have an hour to find out the slow way.
"Summarize this text in a clear and useful way. Give me: 1) the main idea in one sentence, 2) the most important points, 3) what the author is really trying to say, 4) what is useful or actionable, 5) what is repeated, weak, or unnecessary, 6) a final short summary I can remember. Text: [PASTE TEXT]"
Read point 5 first. That's where the filler hides, and it tells you fast whether the full read is worth it. Then, and this is the part everyone skips because it feels redundant, save point 6. That little summary-of-the-summary is the version your brain actually holds a week later. Copy it into your notes. Paste it into a doc you revisit. Long-term retention starts there, not in the full article you'll never reopen.
Five ways to push these further
🔹 Stack them. Run Prompt 1 on a topic, then feed that output into Prompt 2. You end up with a clean reference card you'll actually come back to.
🔹 Still too dense? Add "explain it like I'm a curious 12-year-old" to the end. The drop in jargon is immediate.
🔹 Cap the firehose. A reader's tip: add "don't overwhelm me with too much detail in the first pass" under the study prompt to keep the first round digestible.
🔹 Chunk long stuff. Working through a book chapter or a long report? Split it and paste one section at a time into Prompt 2. You get tighter, more accurate summaries than dumping the whole thing in at once.
🔹 Test what you "know." Run Prompt 1 on a topic you're confident about. The five questions will find the soft spots.
Hiring in 8 countries shouldn't require 8 different processes
This guide from Deel breaks down how to build one global hiring system. You’ll learn about assessment frameworks that scale, how to do headcount planning across regions, and even intake processes that work everywhere. As HR pros know, hiring in one country is hard enough. So let this free global hiring guide give you the tools you need to avoid global hiring headaches.
*Ad
What good output actually looks like
A good study session feels like a conversation, not a lecture. If the response opens with a wall of definitions, push back: "show me what this looks like in practice before you explain the theory." That one line resets the frame and usually produces a far better teaching sequence.
The best answers have rhythm. A concept, an example, a check. If you're getting paragraphs with nothing grounded in the real world, ask for an analogy. Ask what someone gets wrong on their first attempt. Ask what the concept looks like when it breaks down. Those redirects aren't workarounds, they are the actual skill of learning with AI.
Output quality tracks your participation, almost one to one. Passive readers get passive content. Ask back, push back, and the tool starts behaving like a real thinking partner instead of a vending machine.
Your 10-minute challenge today
Pick the one topic you've been putting off for months. You know the one. Run it through Prompt 1, read the whole thing, and answer the five questions out loud. Ten minutes, no more excuses. Reply and tell me what gap it surfaced, because there's always one.
Poll: be honest
How do you actually use ChatGPT to learn right now?
